Safety Officer’s Report:                                         Steve Coomer, Safety Officer

From HardTail to SofTail, the evolution of rear suspensions…

In each of the previous articles I discussed the development of front suspensions, how they work, and how rake and trail affect the handling of the motorcycle. This information built on my article covering tire sizes, ratings, and general tire safety. Having covered the front end of the bike, it is time to look at how the motorcycle rear suspension evolved from the earliest days of no springs, to sprung seats, and finally to the coil-over-hydraulic shock suspended pivoting rear fork that is commonplace today.

The first motorcycles of the late 1880’s had outrigger wheels and tractor seats mounted solid to the framework. Steam engines were the technology of the times, and internal combustion engines were in their infancy. The suspension and seat on these first machines were non-flexing and every bump was felt, sometimes rather harshly, depending upon the speed at impact. Bicycles of the period actually had sprung saddle seats that were more comfortable than the first motorcycles.

By the late 1890’s, small, single cylinder engines were becoming more readily available and a handful of companies were producing them (most notably DeDion, Aurora/Thor, and Marsh) for the various bicycle manufacturers (Schwinn, Hendee, and others) to experiment with. This laid the groundwork for the appearance of nearly 300 motorcycle manufacturers just in the United States by the early 1900’s. As reliable motors grew smaller, it wasn’t long before bicycle frames became modified to fit the driveline. In addition to accommodating the idler wheel control and leather belt pulley, the frame was strengthened to handle the ‘mighty’ 3 and 5 horsepower motors being produced. In addition to building motorcycles beginning in 1903, Harley openly advertised their turnkey motors starting in 1905.

Starting one of these beasts was accomplished by pedaling (as in bicycle) until enough momentum was developed to fire the engine. Stopping was accomplished by applying the coaster (as in bicycle) brake in the rear wheel hub. There were no front brakes, but speeds were relatively slow due to the rarity of smooth roads back then. During this early era, almost all of the seats had small coil springs at the rear of the saddle and a pivoting coil at the front, mounted on a base plate that bolted directly to the frame downtube. The greatest single advance to this configuration was the 1912 “Full Floeting” saddle offered by Harley on the X8A, which was the standard sprung bicycle saddle now mounted on a spring-loaded support inside of the downtube and secured with a pivot at the upper back portion of the fuel tank. This configuration hung around until the early 1980’s.

Due in part to their success and innovation on the racetrack, BMW was the first company to offer a functional rear suspension in the mid-30’s. This ‘plunger-type’ system was the predecessor to the present-day motorcycle rear shock with coil springs. The frame was still rigid, but the ‘shock’ had flanges to mount the axle through, allowing for almost 4 inches of independent travel of the rear wheel. In addition to this breakthrough, the seat was still sprung as well, allowing for the most in comfort and luxury at that time.

Indian and Harley each competed for the Army’s desert service motorcycle and copied BMW’s suspension and shaft drive for the Indian 841 and the Harley-Davidson XA. Less than 50 each of these models saw production due to the African campaign ending prior to acceptance testing being completed.

In 1947, Triumph began offering an internally sprung rear hub. While this was no match for the plunger-type rear suspension being used on BMW’s and Indians, it was better than anything else offered on a motorcycle at the time. Ironically, while Harley had been using the plunger-type suspension for developing their desert bike, the rear suspension never made it onto their street bikes. Harleys weren’t due for a rear suspension until the introduction of the 750cc Model K in 1952. It might be of interest to Sportster fans that ‘their’ bike’s predecessor had Harley’s best suspension for 6 years before the ‘big twin’ finally received it.

The motorcycle suspension, as we know it today, began evolving in strides during the fifties. Triumph still had their sprung hubs and some found their way onto BSA’s. The companies of Indian, BMW, and Ariel were using the plunger design on their bikes, but more importantly, Ariel was also using the first coil-over shock swingarm on its 250cc scooters. Most notably, Harley introduced its swingarm on the ’52 K-model and AJS introduced their version in England on their 350cc street bikes. Other notable changes during the era were the disappearance of sprung seats in favor of frame-mounting and the development of the triangulated swingarm--invented by Vincent and used on the 1951 Rapide. Finally, in 1958, Harley managed to put a beefier version of the K-model swingarm on all of their big twins with the introduction of the Duo-Glide. 

The sixties and seventies saw nothing more than cosmetic variations of the now-generic coil-over-shock swingarm frame. Some bikes covered the springs, some had them chromed, some painted, and some shocks totally encased in chromed or painted tubes. Swingarm lengths varied by manufacturer in an attempt to optimize the ride and rear wheel geometry. The plunger rear suspensions began reappearing at this time spliced onto rigid wishbone frames and being marketed as ‘savior’ frames. Chopper builders loved ‘em because now it was possible to ease the bumps in the road while having a clean looking frame at the rear seat and sissy bar area.

The early eighties saw the use of air shocks on the rear of big touring bikes. At the same time, the Harley Comfort Flex seat utilized the sprung post from the 1912 design in addition to a spring contraption something akin to the fabled Mongolian Monster Trap. The seat had adjustable firmness and damping beyond what was available through the shocks for ride comfort control. While it is unknown how many monsters were actually caught by this clunky spring-loaded mechanism, I know of a few sets of fingers that hated the blasted paperweights. Thankfully (for many mechanics) that contraption faded into history by 1984 with the advent of the FXR and newer rubber-mounted frames. The final noteworthy suspension item of the eighties was the marketing coup pulled-off by Harley with the introduction of the 1984 SofTail. Remember the Vincent Rapide with its triangulated swingarm? Thirty-three years after its introduction, Harley resurrected and refined this configuration with the shocks being hidden under the frame and becoming the SofTail. 1984 also saw the first of the Evo motors wrapped in the frame that was reminiscent of the old hardtails. While the SofTail suspension left much to be desired for 2-up long distance riding, it was a great solo ride that was a throwback to a bygone era.

The nineties saw some frame enhancements to improve rigidity of the backbone on the swingarm frames from the various manufacturers. BMW pioneered ABS systems for motorcycles, introducing them in 1991. This led them to re-tune their suspensions to control inertial reactions and resulted in one of the smoothest, best handling tourers ever made. By the late 90’s shock technology had improved to the point that SofTails finally rode almost as good as they look.

Harley went to larger tubing and stronger box-sections on all of their frames by 2000 and further refined the SofTail by improving the rear suspension and balancing the motor to reduce vibration. After 51 years the Sportster swingarm geometry still provides for a nimble bike that handles well but suffers from a higher center-of-gravity than the big twins. The Dynas and FLH’s still have the best Harley suspension geometries for riding 2-up and are among the best of what is available in the market.

With that said, I have witnessed long-distance 2-up riding on a Buell Blast!!!  

As always, Ride Alert…                                  

Steve